Skip to main content

State Identification Self-Assessment

🧭 State Identification Self-Assessment

Overview

Learners frequently conflate states (temporary altered experiences) with stages (enduring developmental levels) — a confusion that AQAL theory directly addresses. This self-assessment helps you identify which state you are most frequently accessing in practice, receive a personalised recommendation for deepening, and understand how your current state access relates to your likely stage centre of gravity.

The assessment covers four state bands from the Wilberian state spectrum:

State BandPhenomenological Markers
GrossOrdinary waking awareness; sensorimotor reality; body, breath, external sounds
SubtleInner luminosity; flowing energy; absorbed concentration; hypnagogic imagery
Causal / WitnessOpen awareness; witnessing stillness; thoughts observed without identification
NondualDissolution of subject-object boundary; seamless, boundless presence

AQAL Mapping

DimensionValue
Where (Quadrants)I — individual interior experience (self-reflective inquiry)
Depth (Levels)Applicable across all levels; maps to Waking Up pathway
Skills (Lines)Contemplative, Cognitive, Self-awareness
Experience (States)All four state bands: gross, subtle, causal/witness, nondual
Style (Types)Self-paced; introspective; structured-first

Instructions

Answer each question based on your actual recent practice experience, not on how you hope your practice will develop. There are no right or wrong responses. The assessment takes approximately 5–8 minutes to complete.


Assessment

⚠️ Disclaimer: This is a self-reflection tool, not a clinical instrument. It is designed to support contemplative self-inquiry and cannot diagnose, treat, or assess any clinical condition. If you are experiencing psychological distress, please consult a qualified mental health professional.

Answer each question based on your actual recent practice experience — not on how you hope to experience practice or what you think the "correct" answer might be. There are no right or wrong responses.

0 of 12 questions answered

1. In your most recent practice session, the dominant quality of your experience was:
2. When attention settles during practice, it most naturally rests on:
3. When you experience quiet in practice, it most closely feels like:
4. When strong emotions arise during practice, your most common experience is:
5. The quality of your concentration during practice is most often:
6. After a practice session, you most frequently notice:
7. When you close your eyes at the start of a sitting, you most typically notice:
8. During longer or deeper practice sessions, the experience of time feels:
9. The most accurate description of your sense of "self" during practice is:
10. When an unexpected sound occurs during practice, you most often:
11. The practice format that most reliably supports your deepest access is:
12. Which statement best describes your overall relationship to contemplative states?

About the State Spectrum

Gross State (Ordinary Waking)

The gross state is the default waking mode — sensorimotor reality, physical body, external sounds, ordinary thought. It is the necessary foundation for all other state access. Most contemplative traditions begin here with body-anchored or breath-focused practices.

Subtle State (Inner Luminosity and Absorption)

The subtle state is characterised by inner luminosity, flowing energy, absorbed concentration, and dream-like imagery. It is accessed through extended sits, Yoga Nidra, hypnagogic threshold practices, and deep concentration (samatha). Subtle states are temporary and not identical to developmental stages, even when they are profound.

Causal / Witness State (Open Awareness)

The causal or witnessing state is characterised by a stable, spacious background from which thoughts, feelings, and perceptions are observed without identification. It is accessed through open awareness meditation, self-inquiry, and noting practice. The witness is not a developmental endpoint — it too can be released into nondual presence.

Nondual State (Seamless Presence)

The nondual state involves a dissolving of the ordinary subject-object boundary — a glimpse of awareness as the ground of experience rather than as a separate observer. It is pointed to by Dzogchen, Advaita, Zen, and other non-dual traditions. Glimpse quality and integration are distinct; frequent glimpses do not guarantee stable integration.


State vs. Stage: An Important Distinction

A high score on causal or nondual state access does not indicate an advanced developmental stage. States are temporary and peak experiences available at many stage levels. Stages reflect enduring structural capacities that develop over time through lived experience, challenge, and integration.

Someone at an Amber stage centre of gravity can have profound nondual glimpses. Someone with a Green or Teal stage centre of gravity may primarily access gross-state awareness. The value of state work is in deepening access, stabilising integration, and understanding how states and stages interact — not in using state access as a proxy for developmental altitude.


Evidence and Citations

ClaimSourceQualityCaveat
Four-state spectrum (gross, subtle, causal, nondual)Wilber, K. (2006). Integral Spirituality. Shambhala.Tier C — conceptual/theoretical frameworkNot empirically validated as discrete categories; contested in academic contemplative science
Phenomenological markers of meditative statesLutz, A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2007). Meditation and the neuroscience of consciousness. In P. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.Tier B — peer-reviewed synthesis with limited direct replication for these categoriesNeuroscientific markers differ across traditions; first-person categories are author-synthesised
State-stage distinctionWilber, K. (2006). Integral Spirituality. Shambhala; Torbert, W. (2004). Action Inquiry. Berrett-Koehler.Tier C — theoretical model with limited direct empirical testingState-stage interaction models have limited empirical testing
Self-assessment in transformative learningMezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. Jossey-Bass.Tier C — adjacent theoretical support, indirect applicationApplied here to contemplative context by analogy, not direct replication
Contemplative state phenomenologyContemplative Sciences Center, University of Virginia. (2020). Neurophenomenology of Meditation.Tier C — institutional/programmatic report, provisional evidenceOngoing research program; findings subject to revision

Retrieval Schedule

IntervalActivity
24 hoursRetake the assessment after your next practice session; note any shift in responses
72 hoursJournal: What was the dominant quality of your last three sits? Does it match your profile?
7 daysComplete one module recommended by your profile; return to the assessment and compare
14 daysReflect: How does your state access relate to what you are learning about stages and development?

Safety Notes

This assessment involves self-reflective inquiry about contemplative experiences. It is Tier 1 (low intensity — self-paced, no facilitator required).

  • This tool is not a substitute for guidance from an experienced teacher in your contemplative tradition.
  • If practice-related experiences are causing distress, confusion, or functional impairment, consult a qualified teacher or mental health professional.
  • See the State Development Safety Standard for full contraindications and escalation guidance.