Skip to main content

Product Charter

Integral Education Platform — Product Charter

Status: Draft — Pending human owner review and approval
Version: 0.1
Last Updated: 2026-04-05
Classification: [HUMAN-RECOMMENDED] — Copilot-drafted; human owners must validate scope, constraints, and sign-off section before this becomes authoritative.


1. Mission Statement

The Integral Education Platform delivers evidence-based, developmentally-informed learning experiences that support whole-person growth across the cognitive, emotional, somatic, interpersonal, and ethical lines of development.

We apply the AQAL framework (All Quadrants, All Levels, All Lines, All States, All Types) to design pathways that are:

  • Grounded in adult learning science (self-direction, relevance, problem-centred inquiry)
  • Safe, consent-led, and accessible (WCAG 2.2)
  • Measurable against clear developmental outcomes

2. Strategic Objectives

#ObjectiveSuccess Indicator
O1Provide accessible integral learning pathways≥2 learner-facing pilot pathways launched by M3
O2Maintain evidence quality across all content100% of published claims pass the Evidence-Vetting Checklist
O3Uphold safety standards for shadow and reflective practicesZero Tier 3 safety incidents unescalated within 24 h
O4Achieve measurable learner outcomes in pilot cohort≥70% of pilot learners demonstrate pre→post gains on self-report rubric
O5Operate with transparent, auditable governanceCharter, RACI, and decision log current within each milestone

3. Scope

3.1 In Scope

  • Design and publishing of AQAL-aligned learning modules following the Mastery Loop (Learn → Practice → Reflect → Assess → Integrate → Retrieval)
  • Two pilot pathways for M2–M3:
    • Pathway A: Integral Foundations (4 weeks)
    • Pathway B: Shadow Integration Foundations (4 weeks, low-risk Tier 1)
  • Supporting governance artifacts: charter, RACI, backlog, evidence checklist, peer review SOP, safety standard
  • Docusaurus-based platform hosted on GitHub Pages
  • Analytics schema and pilot revision report

3.2 Out of Scope

ExclusionRationale
Clinical therapy or counsellingPlatform is educational, not clinical; mental health services require licensed practitioners
Live facilitator certification programmeRequires qualified human credentialing body; flagged [HUMAN-REQUIRED]
Automated learner assessment or grading algorithmsRubrics are self-assessed; algorithmic grading not appropriate without validity study
Recruitment, consent collection, and live facilitationParticipant operations are [HUMAN-REQUIRED]
Personalised AI coachingOut of scope for M1–M3; may be assessed in a future charter revision

4. Measurable Outcomes (M1–M3)

Milestone 1 (Weeks 1–4) — Foundations and Governance

DeliverableOwnerAcceptance Criteria
Product Charter (this document)[PLACEHOLDER: Product Owner]Approved by owner and stakeholders; stored in repo
RACI matrix[PLACEHOLDER: Product Owner]All roles filled; no gaps in curriculum/safety/analytics
Backlog (backlog.md)CopilotAll M1 Copilot tasks marked complete
AQAL Competency MapCopilot + [PLACEHOLDER: SME]Domains, levels, and progression indicators defined
ILP Practice TaxonomyCopilot + [PLACEHOLDER: SME]Taxonomy dimensions and safety notes populated
Evidence-Vetting ChecklistCopilotGates 1–8 documented and approved
Peer Review SOPCopilotReviewer roles, rounds, and decision log defined
Shadowwork Safety StandardCopilotTier model, stop rules, and escalation path complete

Milestone 2 (Weeks 5–8) — Pilot Content and Prototype

DeliverableOwnerAcceptance Criteria
Pathway A contentCopilot + [PLACEHOLDER: Curriculum Lead]4 weeks, retrieval schedule, faculty-validated
Pathway B contentCopilot + [PLACEHOLDER: Safety Lead]Safety checkpoints, consent, Tier 1 only
Clickable prototypeCopilotPathway, practice flow, and rubric UX navigable

Milestone 3 (Weeks 9–12) — Pilot Execution and Revision

DeliverableOwnerAcceptance Criteria
Pilot runbookCopilot + [PLACEHOLDER: Pilot Coordinator]Recruitment, consent, scheduling, support documented
Pilot delivery (20–40 learners)[HUMAN-REQUIRED]Sessions delivered; incident log maintained
Pilot revision reportCopilot + [PLACEHOLDER: Analyst]Quantitative and qualitative findings; prioritised change issues

5. Constraints

ConstraintDescription
SafetyAny shadow or emotionally intense content must follow the Shadowwork Safety Standard
EvidenceNo claim published without passing the Evidence-Vetting Checklist
AccessibilityAll learner-facing content must meet WCAG 2.2 Level AA
Cognitive loadMicrolearning units capped at 3–5 minutes; one concept per unit; no extraneous visuals
Scope guardNo therapeutic framing; no clinical claims; no facilitator-led Tier 3 practice without qualified human oversight
ConsentExplicit, revocable consent required before any reflective or shadow practice
Data privacyLearner reflection data is private by default; minimum retention; role-based access only

6. Governance Cadence

CadenceActivityOwner
WeeklyProgress check against backlog; blocker escalation[PLACEHOLDER: Product Owner]
Per milestoneCharter and RACI review; backlog grooming; go/no-go decision[PLACEHOLDER: Steering Group]
Per content releaseEvidence-vetting checklist pass; peer review sign-off[PLACEHOLDER: Content Reviewer]
On incidentSafety incident documented; escalation actioned within 24 h[PLACEHOLDER: Safety Lead]
QuarterlyFull charter review; scope and outcome re-validation[PLACEHOLDER: Product Owner + Steering Group]

7. Decision Authority (Summary RACI)

See the full RACI Matrix for role definitions and workflow assignments.

DecisionAccountableConsulted
Scope changesProduct OwnerSteering Group
Content publicationContent ReviewerCurriculum Lead, SME
Safety tier classificationSafety LeadClinical Advisor
Pilot go/no-goPilot Coordinator + Product OwnerAll stakeholders
Charter revisionProduct OwnerSteering Group

8. Risks and Mitigations

RiskLikelihoodImpactMitigation
Shadow content causes participant distressMediumHighTier model, consent, stop rules, trained facilitators
Evidence quality insufficient for claimsMediumMediumMandatory evidence-vetting gate before publication
Scope creep into clinical territoryLowHighExplicit exclusion list; quarterly charter review
Pilot recruitment underperformsMediumMediumRunbook with recruitment scripts; coordinator assigned [HUMAN-REQUIRED]
Key role vacancies (SME, Safety Lead)MediumHighIdentify owners before M2 launch; flag blockers weekly

9. Stakeholder Roles

Action required: Assign a named human to each placeholder before charter approval.

RoleResponsibilityCurrent Owner
Product OwnerCharter, scope decisions, milestone go/no-go[PLACEHOLDER]
Curriculum LeadModule design, learning objective quality[PLACEHOLDER]
Subject-Matter Expert (SME)AQAL and ILP content accuracy[PLACEHOLDER]
Safety LeadShadowwork safety tier review, incident escalation[PLACEHOLDER]
Clinical AdvisorSafety model clinical review[PLACEHOLDER — HUMAN-REQUIRED]
Content ReviewerEvidence vetting and peer review[PLACEHOLDER]
Pilot CoordinatorRunbook, recruitment, live facilitation operations[PLACEHOLDER — HUMAN-REQUIRED]
AnalystAnalytics schema, pilot data, revision report[PLACEHOLDER]
Accessibility LeadWCAG 2.2 review[PLACEHOLDER]

10. Approval and Sign-Off

This section must be completed by named human owners before this charter is authoritative.

RoleNameDateSignature
Product Owner[PLACEHOLDER][DATE][SIGNATURE]
Safety Lead[PLACEHOLDER][DATE][SIGNATURE]
Clinical Advisor[PLACEHOLDER][DATE][SIGNATURE]
Steering Group Representative[PLACEHOLDER][DATE][SIGNATURE]

11. Version History

VersionDateAuthorChange Summary
0.12026-04-05CopilotInitial draft for human review