Fawkes Project Charter
Project Name
Fawkes - An Open Source Internal Delivery Platform
Vision
To become the leading open-source Internal Delivery Platform that empowers organizations to achieve elite DORA performance while fostering a culture of continuous learning and improvement in platform engineering.
Mission
Provide a production-ready, comprehensive Internal Delivery Platform that:
- Enables rapid, secure software delivery through automation and best practices
- Makes DORA metrics a first-class citizen with automated collection and visualization
- Integrates learning and skill development through a dojo-style curriculum
- Supports multi-cloud infrastructure with GitOps and Infrastructure as Code
- Prioritizes security through DevSecOps practices and zero-trust principles
- Creates an exceptional developer experience that reduces cognitive load
Problem Statement
Organizations struggle to build effective Internal Developer Platforms due to:
- Complexity: Platform engineering requires expertise across dozens of tools and practices
- Integration Challenges: Stitching together CI/CD, observability, security, and deployment tools is time-consuming
- Metrics Blind Spots: Teams lack visibility into DORA metrics and platform effectiveness
- Skills Gap: Platform engineering skills are scarce; teams need learning resources integrated with tools
- Reinventing the Wheel: Every organization builds similar platforms, duplicating effort
- Vendor Lock-in: Commercial platforms create dependencies and limit customization
Solution
Fawkes provides an opinionated, integrated platform that includes:
Core Platform Capabilities:
- Kubernetes-based infrastructure provisioning (AWS, Azure, GCP)
- GitOps workflows for declarative infrastructure and application management
- CI/CD pipelines with golden path templates
- Automated security scanning and compliance checks
- Comprehensive observability stack (metrics, logs, traces)
- Developer portal (Backstage) for self-service and discovery
- Deployment strategies (blue-green, canary, progressive delivery)
Differentiators:
- DORA Metrics Automation: Automated collection and visualization of all four key metrics
- Dojo Learning Curriculum: Integrated learning paths aligned with platform capabilities
- Certification Integration: Aligned with Platform Engineering University certifications
- Open Source & Extensible: No vendor lock-in, community-driven development
- Security-First: Comprehensive scanning, policy-as-code, zero-trust roadmap
- Multi-Cloud Native: Designed for multi-cloud from the start
Target Audience
Primary Users
- Platform Engineering Teams (5-50 people) in mid to large enterprises
- DevOps Teams transitioning to platform engineering model
- Engineering Leaders seeking to improve DORA metrics and developer productivity
Secondary Users
- Application Developers who benefit from the platform's self-service capabilities
- Platform Engineering Students learning through hands-on implementation
- DevOps Consultants implementing IDPs for clients
Geographic Focus
- Initial: North America, Europe (English language)
- Expansion: Global (internationalization in roadmap)
Success Criteria
6-Month Goals (Post-MVP)
- Adoption: 15-25 organizations using Fawkes in production
- Community: 50+ contributors, 1,000+ GitHub stars
- DORA Impact: 3+ published case studies showing measurable DORA improvement
- Learning: 100+ individuals complete at least one dojo module
- Stability: 99.5%+ platform uptime for core components
12-Month Goals
- Adoption: 50+ organizations, 10+ Fortune 1000 companies
- Community: 100+ contributors, 2,500+ GitHub stars, CNCF Sandbox project
- Certification: Official partnership with Platform Engineering University
- Multi-Cloud: Full support for AWS, Azure, GCP
- Revenue: Sustainable funding model (sponsorships, professional services)
24-Month Goals
- Market Position: Top 3 open-source IDP by adoption
- Community: 250+ contributors, 5,000+ GitHub stars, CNCF Incubating project
- Ecosystem: 20+ plugins/extensions from community
- Enterprise: 100+ enterprise deployments with reference architectures
- Research: Published research on IDP adoption and DORA correlation
Key Metrics
Platform Performance Metrics
- Deployment Frequency: Track improvements for adopting teams
- Lead Time for Changes: Measure from commit to production
- Change Failure Rate: Monitor failed deployments
- Time to Restore Service: Track incident recovery times
Community Health Metrics
- Contributors: Active monthly contributors
- Pull Requests: PR volume and merge rate
- Response Time: Time to first response on issues
- Community Size: Slack/Discord members, mailing list subscribers
Business Metrics
- Adoption: Organizations deploying Fawkes
- NPS Score: User satisfaction (target: 50+)
- Documentation Quality: Page views, search success rate
- Cost Savings: Infrastructure efficiency vs. manual platform building
Guiding Principles
1. Developer Experience is Paramount
Every feature must improve developer productivity, reduce cognitive load, or enable self-service.
2. Measure Everything
If it can't be measured, it can't be improved. Build observability into every component.
3. Security is Non-Negotiable
Security scanning, policy enforcement, and compliance are built-in, not bolt-on.
4. Learn While Building
The platform doubles as a learning environment with integrated curriculum.
5. Community Over Features
A healthy, engaged community is more valuable than a feature-complete platform.
6. Open by Default
Decisions, roadmap, metrics, and discussions are public unless privacy requires otherwise.
7. Opinionated but Extensible
Provide golden paths for 80% of use cases; allow customization for the other 20%.
8. Multi-Cloud from Day One
Design for cloud portability even if initial implementation is AWS-only.
Scope
In Scope
- Kubernetes-based infrastructure automation
- CI/CD pipelines and deployment strategies
- Observability (metrics, logs, traces)
- Security scanning and policy enforcement
- Developer portal and self-service catalog
- GitOps workflows
- DORA metrics automation
- Learning curriculum and certification alignment
- Multi-cloud support (AWS, Azure, GCP)
- Documentation and community building
Out of Scope (Explicitly)
- Application frameworks or languages (we provide templates, not frameworks)
- Source control management (we integrate with GitHub/GitLab, not replace them)
- Project management tools (we integrate, not replace)
- Business-specific workflows (keep platform generic, extensible)
- On-premises only deployments (cloud-first, on-prem possible but not primary)
Future Consideration
- Edge computing and IoT deployments
- Machine learning platform capabilities
- FinOps and cost optimization features
- Compliance automation (SOC2, HIPAA, etc.)
- Advanced chaos engineering integration
Risks and Mitigation
Technical Risks
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Integration complexity delays MVP | High | Start with minimal integrations, prioritize stability over features |
| Scalability issues at enterprise scale | High | Design for scale from day one, conduct load testing early |
| Security vulnerabilities in dependencies | High | Automated scanning, regular updates, security-first culture |
Community Risks
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Maintainer burnout | Critical | Grow maintainer team early, establish rotation schedules |
| Low adoption / community interest | High | Invest heavily in documentation, marketing, and partnerships |
| Competing projects fragment efforts | Medium | Differentiate clearly, collaborate where possible |
Business Risks
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Insufficient funding for infrastructure | Medium | Seek cloud credits, CNCF support, sponsorships |
| Certification partnerships fail | Medium | Maintain standalone value, diversify partnerships |
| Enterprise concerns about support | Medium | Build professional services ecosystem, offer paid support options |
Resource Requirements
Human Resources (MVP Phase)
- Technical Lead / Architect: 1 FTE (50% project lead, 50% architecture)
- Backend Engineers: 2-3 contributors (part-time acceptable)
- Documentation Writer: 0.5 FTE (can be distributed)
- Community Manager: 0.25 FTE (grows to 0.5 FTE post-launch)
Infrastructure Resources
- Development/Testing: AWS EKS cluster, supporting services (~$500/month)
- Demo Environment: Always-on demo instance (~$300/month)
- CI/CD: GitHub Actions (free tier initially)
- Communication: Slack/Discord (free tier)
- Documentation Hosting: GitHub Pages or Netlify (free)
Financial Resources (First Year)
- Infrastructure: $10,000 (offset by cloud credits)
- Tools/Services: $5,000 (domain, email, premium tools)
- Events/Marketing: $5,000 (conference travel, swag)
- Contingency: $5,000
- Total: ~$25,000 (significant portion via sponsorships/credits)
Stakeholders
Internal Stakeholders
- Project Lead: Overall vision and strategy
- Maintainer Team: Technical direction and execution
- Core Contributors: Feature development and community support
External Stakeholders
- Platform Engineering University: Certification alignment, educational content
- CNCF: Potential project hosting, infrastructure support, visibility
- Cloud Providers (AWS, Azure, GCP): Infrastructure credits, reference architectures
- Enterprise Users: Requirements, feedback, case studies
- Open Source Community: Contributors, users, advocates
Communication Plan
Internal Communication
- Maintainer Meetings: Bi-weekly, 60 minutes, public minutes
- Contributor Sync: Monthly, 30 minutes, open to all contributors
- Async Updates: GitHub Discussions, Slack channels
External Communication
- Community Newsletter: Bi-weekly updates on progress, contributions
- Blog Posts: Weekly technical content, case studies, announcements
- Social Media: Daily engagement on Twitter/X, LinkedIn
- Office Hours: Bi-weekly, live Q&A and support
- Conferences: Quarterly speaking engagements (KubeCon, PlatformCon, DevOpsDays)
Crisis Communication
- Security Issues: Immediate disclosure via security mailing list, GitHub advisory
- Service Outages: Status page updates, post-mortem published within 48 hours
- Community Issues: Transparent handling per Code of Conduct, documented decisions
Timeline
Phase 0: Foundation (Weeks 1-2)
- Establish governance, communication infrastructure
- Initial documentation and architecture
Phase 1: Core Platform (Weeks 3-5)
- Backstage portal, CI/CD pipelines, GitOps implementation
Phase 2: Observability (Weeks 6-8)
- Metrics stack, DORA automation, deployment strategies
Phase 3: Launch Preparation (Weeks 9-12)
- Documentation completion, dojo curriculum, launch activities
Post-MVP: Iteration and Growth (Months 4-12)
- Multi-cloud expansion, advanced features, community scaling
Success Celebration
Milestone Celebrations
- First Contributor: Public thank you, contributor spotlight
- MVP Launch: Virtual celebration, team recognition
- 100 GitHub Stars: Social media celebration, community thank you
- First Production Deployment: Case study, blog post
- 1 Year Anniversary: Annual report, contributor awards, retrospective
Amendment Process
This charter may be amended through the governance process defined in GOVERNANCE.md. Major changes require community input and maintainer approval.
Charter Version: 1.0 Established: October 4, 2025 Last Reviewed: October 4, 2025 Next Review: April 4, 2026 (6-month intervals)
Approved By:
- Project Lead: [Your Name/Signature]
- Date: October 4, 2025
Appendix: Alignment with Industry Standards
DORA Research Alignment
Fawkes directly supports all 24 DORA capabilities with particular focus on:
- Trunk-based development
- Continuous integration and delivery
- Monitoring and observability
- Database change management
- Infrastructure as code
Platform Engineering Principles
Aligned with Team Topologies and platform engineering best practices:
- Platform as a product mindset
- Self-service capabilities
- Cognitive load reduction
- Enabling team structure
CNCF Landscape
Positioned in the CNCF landscape as:
- Category: Developer Portal / Internal Developer Platform
- Complementary to: Backstage, ArgoCD, Prometheus
- Competing with: Commercial IDPs (Humanitec, Port.io)
End of Charter